Skip to content

EXPERIMENTAL: Remove move_to and helper methods in favor of using position field directly. - #88

Closed
johnnyshields wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
experimental-use-position-instead-of-move-to
Closed

johnnyshields wants to merge 2 commits into
masterfrom
experimental-use-position-instead-of-move-to

Conversation

@johnnyshields

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

No description provided.

… be replaced with the position field directly. There are a few edge case specs to fix but overall it has potential to be much cleaner than current.
@dblock

dblock commented Oct 17, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thank you for investigating this, @johnnyshields. #92 addresses the embedded-position failures using your regression tests (with co-author credit), while preserving move_to and its helper APIs. It uses the original embedded position for sibling shifts and excludes pending positions when determining bounds; it does not adopt the experimental broader rewrite or its debug output. The current compatibility matrix passes. Closing this experiment in favor of the scoped fix; removing the movement API would be a separate design decision.

Posted by an AI on behalf of @dblock.

@dblock dblock closed this Oct 17, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants