fix: retain emergency-approval findings when the approver is blank

docs/CONTROL_CATALOG.md

@@ -68,6 +68,8 @@
 
 **需核实的例外。** 授权政策可能规定其他起算点或值班批准路径；如补批存在于外部系统，需补充原始证据。
 
+补批人 ID 为空字符串或仅含空白字符时同样视为缺失；及时的补批时间不能代替可识别的批准人。原始 ID 内容仍保留在关联证据和底稿中。
+
 **局限。** 补批及时不表示应急理由正当，也不表示事后审查足够独立或完整。
 
 ## 复核与证据的使用边界

src/controltrace/rules.py

@@ -708,13 +708,13 @@ def evaluate(data: dict[str, list[dict]]) -> list[dict[str, Any]]:
         completed_approvals = [
             (approved, row) for row in matching_emergencies
             if (approved := parse_utc(row["retrospective_approved_at"])) is not None
-            and approved <= cutoff and row["retrospective_approver_id"]
+            and approved <= cutoff and (row["retrospective_approver_id"] or "").strip()
         ]
         incomplete_on_time = [
             row for row in matching_emergencies
             if (approved := parse_utc(row["retrospective_approved_at"])) is not None
             and deployed <= approved <= min(due, cutoff)
-            and not row["retrospective_approver_id"]
+            and not (row["retrospective_approver_id"] or "").strip()
         ]
         before_deployment = [
             row for approved, row in completed_approvals if approved < deployed

tests/test_exports.py

@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
 import json
 import zipfile
 
+import duckdb
 import pytest
 
 from controltrace.cli import main
@@ -16,6 +17,30 @@
 from controltrace.verify import BundleVerificationError, verify_bundle
 
 
+def test_blank_emergency_approver_stays_visible_through_database_and_bundle(tmp_path):
+    database = tmp_path / "blank-approver.duckdb"
+    initialize_db(database)
+    with duckdb.connect(str(database)) as connection:
+        connection.execute(
+            "UPDATE emergency_changes SET retrospective_approved_at = ?, "
+            "retrospective_approver_id = ? WHERE emergency_id = ?",
+            ["2025-06-21T09:00:00Z", " \t ", "EM005"],
+        )
+    finding = next(
+        item for item in run_tests(database)
+        if item["entity_id"] == "D005" and item["issue_code"] == "emergency_approver_unknown"
+    )
+    assert finding["classification"] == "manual_review"
+    source = next(
+        item["record"] for item in finding["related_records"]
+        if item["table"] == "emergency_changes"
+    )
+    assert source["retrospective_approver_id"] == " \t "
+    destination = tmp_path / "workpapers.zip"
+    destination.write_bytes(workpaper_zip(database, {finding["finding_id"]}))
+    assert verify_bundle(destination)["exported_findings"] == 1
+
+
 @pytest.mark.parametrize("payload", ["[]", "null", "42", '"not a manifest"'])
 def test_invalid_manifest_shape_returns_a_cli_error(tmp_path, capsys, payload):
     path = tmp_path / "invalid-manifest.zip"

tests/test_rules.py

@@ -493,11 +493,13 @@ def test_multiple_emergency_records_use_any_complete_approval_within_deadline():
         assert not _has(findings, "emergency_approval_overdue", "D006")
 
 
-def test_emergency_approval_timestamp_without_approver_needs_review():
+@pytest.mark.parametrize("approver", [None, "", " ", "\t\r\n", "\u00a0"])
+def test_emergency_approval_timestamp_without_approver_needs_review(approver):
     data = deepcopy(generate_demo_data())
-    _record(data, "emergency_changes", "emergency_id", "EM005")[
-        "retrospective_approved_at"
-    ] = "2025-06-21T09:00:00Z"
+    _record(data, "emergency_changes", "emergency_id", "EM005").update(
+        retrospective_approved_at="2025-06-21T09:00:00Z",
+        retrospective_approver_id=approver,
+    )
     findings = evaluate(data)
     assert _has(findings, "emergency_approver_unknown", "D005")
     assert not _has(findings, "emergency_approval_overdue", "D005")