[albanv]

Four commits: the feature, the move of the package to our current tooling, the update of its dependencies, and a typing fix found while plugging a TypeScript caller onto the built package (the matches of forbidden are typed link or phone, never email).

1. Report what a text should be refused for

Why

censorify-it finds links, emails and phone numbers to censor them. We also want to refuse a text that holds a link or a phone number, at the time it is written. The same package should answer both, so that what is refused and what is censored do not drift apart.

The existing detection cannot be reused as is for refusing. It is tuned to censor, where a false positive only costs a few stars:

Text	Found today	If we refused on it
evil.cfd/a/x (no scheme, unknown TLD)	nothing	the link goes through
see you soon.In any case	soon.In, as a link	an honest text is refused
group of 12 15 20 25 people	12 15 20 25, as a phone number	an honest text is refused

What

• forbidden(text) lists the links and phone numbers a text should be refused for, exceptions applied. It relies on a strict detection, kept apart from the one used to censor:
  • links: scheme://, www., domain/path or domain?query, whatever the TLD. A bare domain is not reported;
  • phone numbers: international ones from 8 digits, national ones from 9 digits. Dates and lists of small numbers are left aside.
• Every match has a type: link, email or phone.
• Exceptions can be given by type: set({ exceptions: { link: [...], phone: [...] } }). A single list still works. By type is safer: a loose phone number pattern in a single list also lets through the links holding these digits.
• Censoring gains one case: a link written without scheme on an unknown TLD is now censored, and a strict link wins over the loose match it holds (evil.cfd?mysite.com/x is one link to evil.cfd). The censoring of phone numbers and emails is unchanged: the six existing tests pass untouched.

Everything forbidden reports is censored by process as well; a test holds that property.

Known limits of the strict detection

• Not seen: 8-digit national numbers written without + (they look like a date), numbers spelled out or split with slashes, obfuscated links (evil . com).
• Wrongly seen: a few runs of 9 digits or more that are not phone numbers, such as a reference or 150.00-200.00.
• No lookbehind is used, for old Safari.

2. TypeScript, ES modules, vite and vitest

• TypeScript: the source is a class extending LinkifyIt, and the package ships its types (CensorifyIt, Match, Options, Exceptions...).
• ES module, built with vite, with a CommonJS build: dist/censorify-it.js and dist/censorify-it.cjs. The class is the default export and a named one. Until now a default import under Node ESM gave the module object, and new CensorifyIt() threw.
• vitest replaces jest, with coverage (98.8 % of statements).
• Lint and hooks as in our other packages: flat config of eslint-config-vizeat, husky, lint-staged and commitlint. babel is gone.
• CI rewritten: the previous workflow relied on deprecated actions and failed before running anything. The new one lints, checks types, builds, loads the built package both ways (import and require), and tests with coverage, on Node 24.
• Dependencies updated. linkify-it goes from 3 to 5: over 26,000 sample texts, the only change in what is censored is a trailing punctuation mark or closing bracket that is no longer swallowed. It does not go to 6, which no longer finds an email written right after a label (email:john@example.com) nor a domain with a port (evil.com:8080); a test holds these two cases, so the Renovate PR for v6 will fail. TypeScript goes to 6, not 7 (vite-plugin-dts needs the JavaScript compiler API), vitest to 5, commitlint to 21, lint-staged to 17.

Breaking changes

Version 4.0.0:

• the package is an ES module with an exports map: its files moved, and deep imports are no longer possible;
• require('censorify-it').default still gives the class.

The API is otherwise only extended.

Tests

51 tests pass (6 existing, 45 new), lint and type check pass. The built package was loaded both ways under Node, and the test suite of a TypeScript ESM project depending on it passes against the local build.

To check on this repository

• CODECOV_TOKEN must exist in the repository secrets for the coverage upload.
• Publishing is unchanged: yarn pub, to the public npm registry.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (ee20392) to head (114be58).
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##            master      #161   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines           50        70   +20     
  Branches        11        22   +11     
=========================================
+ Hits            50        70   +20     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.