feat(agents): improve workflow diagnostics and tool execution - #8290
waleedlatif1 wants to merge 13 commits into
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
1 issue found across 166 files
Confidence score: 4/5
- In
apps/sim/tools/slack/update_message.ts, an invocation with neithertextnorblockspasses validation and reaches Slack without content; enforce that at least one is provided.
Prompt for AI agents (unresolved issues)
Check if these issues are valid — if so, understand the root cause of each and fix them. If appropriate, use sub-agents to investigate and fix each issue separately.
<file name="apps/sim/tools/slack/update_message.ts">
<violation number="1" location="apps/sim/tools/slack/update_message.ts:53">
P3: `text` and `blocks` are now both optional and nothing enforces the description's claim that text is only omitted when blocks are provided. An invocation with neither field passes the `required` checks, reaches Slack's `chat.update` through `executeSlackUpdateMessage`, and fails with Slack's opaque `invalid_arguments` error instead of a clear local validation message. Raise a clear error in `operation.input` (or a validation step) when both are absent so the failure is caught before the provider call.</violation>
</file>
Tip: instead of fixing issues one by one fix them all with cubic
Re-trigger cubic
|
|
@cubic-dev-ai review this PR |
@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed across 192 files
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.
Fix all with cubic | Re-trigger cubic
|
@cubic-dev-ai review this PR |
@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed across 196 files
Reply with feedback, questions, or to request a fix.
Fix all with cubic | Re-trigger cubic
|
@cubic-dev-ai review this PR |
@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete. |
|
@cubic-dev-ai review this PR |
@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No issues found across 197 files
Confidence score: 5/5
- Automated review surfaced no issues in the provided summaries.
- No files require special attention.
You've manually re-run cubic several times on this PR. Each manual re-review checks the full PR again and counts toward your usage quota. To preserve your usage limits, we recommend letting cubic automatically review new commits.
Re-trigger cubic
|
@cubic-dev-ai review this PR |
@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete. |
|
@cubic-dev-ai review this PR |
@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed across 203 files
Note: This PR contains a large number of files. cubic selects up to 200 of the highest-priority eligible files for this review, so some files may not have been reviewed.
You've manually re-run cubic several times on this PR. Each manual re-review checks the full PR again and counts toward your usage quota. To preserve your usage limits, we recommend letting cubic automatically review new commits.
Fix all with cubic | Re-trigger cubic
8f98389 to
a8f3ce7
Compare
|
@cubic-dev-ai review this PR |
@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All reported issues were addressed across 212 files
Note: This PR contains a large number of files. cubic selects up to 200 of the highest-priority eligible files for this review, so some files may not have been reviewed.
You've manually re-run cubic several times on this PR. Each manual re-review checks the full PR again and counts toward your usage quota. To preserve your usage limits, we recommend letting cubic automatically review new commits.
Fix all with cubic | Re-trigger cubic
|
@cubic-dev-ai review this PR |
@waleedlatif1 I have started the AI code review. It will take a few minutes to complete. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
No issues found across 214 files
Confidence score: 5/5
- Automated review surfaced no issues in the provided summaries.
- No files require special attention.
Note: This PR contains a large number of files. cubic selects up to 200 of the highest-priority eligible files for this review, so some files may not have been reviewed.
You've manually re-run cubic several times on this PR. Each manual re-review checks the full PR again and counts toward your usage quota. To preserve your usage limits, we recommend letting cubic automatically review new commits.
Re-trigger cubic
Summary
Type of Change
Testing
Checklist
test-auditauthoring gate)