Skip to content

Improvement: Track Solo 0.2.4-experimental's owner approval record - #1392

Merged
repeat98 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
approval/track-solo-0.2.4
Nov 10, 2026
Merged

repeat98 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
approval/track-solo-0.2.4

Conversation

@repeat98

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner
  • What was wrong or hard: Track Solo 0.2.4-experimental (Track Solo 0.2.4-experimental: hold a track to solo it while editing #1383) is red only on the stock benchmark and stress rows, which I said I would waive: it has no MIDI path, so no cfmeter benchmark or flood applies. The waiver needs the owner's approval record on main.
  • What this changes: adds sdk/approvals/track-solo-build-approval.json, waiving current-build-hardware (which excuses exactly those two rows for a ColdFire record whose fields are null). It binds version 0.2.4-experimental and native source f37562d5…, recomputed with moduleNativeSourceSha256 on Track Solo 0.2.4-experimental: hold a track to solo it while editing #1383's head 7a6ed03e; it matches the author's.
  • How I checked it: npm run pr:ready: Ready. Recomputed the source hash from the PR head's module folder.
  • What the guides lacked or got wrong, and where I fixed it: nothing.

Related to #1383.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…d stress rows

The owner's record for #1383: no MIDI path, so no cfmeter benchmark or flood;
cycles counted in the Octatrack emulator. It binds native source f37562d5…,
recomputed on the pull request's head 7a6ed03.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Nov 10, 2026
@repeat98
repeat98 merged commit 6361ea0 into main Nov 10, 2026
10 checks passed
twwwy added a commit to twwwy/modwerk-beat_slicer that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2026
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant