fix: clear enter lock when select is disabled

[dogledogle]

修复 Select 在异步更新过程中被设为 disabled 后，Enter 键状态未正确重置的问题。

当用户通过搜索并按 Enter 选择选项时，如果 onChange 中立即将 Select 设为 disabled，输入框可能不会触发后续的 keyup 或 blur 事件，导致 Enter 锁状态残留。重新启用 Select 后，用户需要按两次 Enter 才能完成下一次选择。

本次修改会在 Select 进入 disabled 状态时主动清理 Enter 锁，并新增回归测试，确保连续搜索选择只需按一次 Enter。

相关 issue：#51716

Summary by CodeRabbit

• 新功能

  • Select 新增 autoComplete 属性，可自定义自动完成设置。

• 问题修复

  • 修复 Select 在 Enter 操作过程中被禁用后可能残留键盘锁定状态的问题。
  • 重新启用后，可继续正常搜索并按 Enter 依次选择选项。

• 测试

  • 增加禁用、重新启用及后续选择流程的测试覆盖。

[vercel]

@dogledogle is attempting to deploy a commit to the React Component Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

[coderabbitai]

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Advanced

Run ID: 9d3cf680-76bf-43b3-8173-80f12cb967d0

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6449ac5 and d43c729.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)

• src/BaseSelect/index.tsx
• tests/Select.test.tsx

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 4 included reviews per hour; 3 remain after this review.

---

Walkthrough

当 Select 进入 disabled 状态时，组件会清理 Enter 键锁定状态。BaseSelectProps 新增 autoComplete 属性。回归测试验证中断 keyup 后重新启用组件仍可连续键盘选择。

Changes

Select 键盘交互

Layer / File(s)	Summary
禁用状态清理与回归验证 src/BaseSelect/index.tsx, tests/Select.test.tsx	禁用状态变化时将 keyLockRef.current 重置为 false。回归测试覆盖搜索、Enter 选择、禁用后重新启用，以及 [3, 2, 1] 的 onChange 调用顺序。BaseSelectProps 新增可选的 autoComplete 属性。show-arrow 判断改用 isNonNullable。

Estimated code review effort: 2 (Simple) | ~10 minutes

Suggested reviewers: qdyanbing, afc163

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to d43c7

This change restores keyboard selection after a Select is disabled during an Enter-driven async update, with regression coverage for re-enabling and selecting again. No merge-blocking risk is identified.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	标题“fix: clear enter lock when select is disabled”准确概括了主要变更，即在 Select 被禁用时清除 Enter 键锁定状态。标题简洁、明确，并与 PR 目标一致。
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 2…
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.

✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1

🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡

• Create stacked PR
• Commit on current branch

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{小兔按下 Enter 键，
禁用状态清锁定。
键起未至也无妨，
重启搜索选项明。
三二一声回调响。}

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[nrps9909]

Approved exact head 6449ac52419fbd2ef278a4809ba2fb4ed1dfeea6.

The reset is correctly scoped to the existing disabled-state effect: an interrupted Enter interaction clears only the stale selection lock while the same effect already closes the popup and removes focus. Re-enabling the Select therefore restores the first Enter selection without changing ordinary keyup/blur handling.

The complete repository passes 21/21 suites, 437/437 tests, and 21/21 snapshots. TypeScript, ESM/CJS/declaration builds, Less compilation, and lint with zero errors also pass; the reported warnings are existing hook/demo warnings outside this three-line behavior change.

I additionally performed a causal base/head check with the submitted regression. Removing only the new lock reset made the expected [3, 2, 1] selection sequence fail as [3, 2], proving that the first post-enable Enter remained swallowed. Restoring the exact head made the same focused regression pass.

The only remote failure is the fork Vercel authorization gate, not a source check.

Codex-assisted review: Codex traced the Enter lock lifecycle, ran the complete repository and build validation, and executed the isolated causal reversal against the exact head. No repository files were changed.