Skip to content

PEP 825: Mark as provisionally accepted - #5115

Open
mgorny wants to merge 1 commit into
python:mainfrom
wheelnext:pep-825-integration
Open

PEP 825: Mark as provisionally accepted#5115
mgorny wants to merge 1 commit into
python:mainfrom
wheelnext:pep-825-integration

Conversation

@mgorny

@mgorny mgorny commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor
  • SC/PEP Delegate has formally accepted/rejected the PEP and posted to the Discussions-To thread
  • Pull request title in appropriate format (PEP 123: Mark as Accepted)
  • Status changed to Accepted/Rejected
  • Resolution field points directly to SC/PEP Delegate official acceptance/rejected post, including the date (e.g. `01-Jan-2000 <https://discuss.python.org/t/12345/100>`__)
  • Acceptance/rejection notice added, if the SC/PEP delegate had major conditions or comments
  • Discussions-To, Post-History and Python-Version up to date

Signed-off-by: Michał Górny <mgorny@quansight.com>
@mgorny

mgorny commented Sep 6, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

(I suppose this is the right template for provisional acceptance as well.)

@mgorny mgorny changed the title PEP 825: update for the provisional acceptance PEP 825: Mark as provisionally accepted Sep 6, 2026
@read-the-docs-community

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Documentation build overview

📚 pep-previews | 🛠️ Build #34418758 | 📁 Comparing 89573f9 against latest (24419b9)

  🔍 Preview build  

5 files changed · ± 5 modified

± Modified

Comment thread peps/pep-0825.rst
Provisional Acceptance
======================

This PEP has been **provisionally accepted**, This PEP is part of an

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The , This looks like a spelling mistake.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants