#8 Feat: Large transaction handling - #8
Open
ckritzinger wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
ckritzinger wants to merge 1 commit into
ckritzinger wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
ckritzinger
force-pushed
the
carl/large-transaction-handling
branch
from
September 3, 2026 11:05
f5dc468 to
1742e2d
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There is an edge case where the transaction is too large (has too many ops) to process in a single API call.
Some discussion has been had around potential solutions to this problem, I propose the following:
This PR proposes an extension to the OpenAPI description to support this behaviour.
NB: I have not implemented any of the behaviour (client or server), the intent is to obtain consensus on the API semantics before going to that level of detail.
Here's what the sequence looks like: