Repository navigation
fix: register waker for console poll function - #2756
GloriousAlpaca wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Benchmark Results
Details
| Benchmark | Current: b2097d0 | Previous: 2e23902 | Performance Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| startup_benchmark Build Time | 82.90 s |
80.34 s |
1.03 ❗ |
| startup_benchmark File Size | 0.84 MB |
0.80 MB |
1.05 ❗ |
| Startup Time - 1 core | 0.70 s (±0.02 s) |
0.75 s (±0.02 s) |
0.94 ❗ |
| Startup Time - 2 cores | 0.73 s (±0.02 s) |
0.74 s (±0.02 s) |
0.99 |
| Startup Time - 4 cores | 0.74 s (±0.01 s) |
0.74 s (±0.02 s) |
0.99 |
| multithreaded_benchmark Build Time | 84.46 s |
82.11 s |
1.03 ❗ |
| multithreaded_benchmark File Size | 0.94 MB |
0.86 MB |
1.10 ❗ |
| Multithreaded Pi Efficiency - 2 Threads | 92.23 % (±8.64 %) |
85.89 % (±6.61 %) |
1.07 |
| Multithreaded Pi Efficiency - 4 Threads | 44.56 % (±3.71 %) |
43.43 % (±2.56 %) |
1.03 |
| Multithreaded Pi Efficiency - 8 Threads | 26.17 % (±1.64 %) |
25.76 % (±1.53 %) |
1.02 |
| micro_benchmarks Build Time | 84.19 s |
80.40 s |
1.05 ❗ |
| micro_benchmarks File Size | 0.94 MB |
0.86 MB |
1.10 ❗ |
| Scheduling time - 1 thread | 64.60 ticks (±3.39 ticks) |
62.65 ticks (±4.06 ticks) |
1.03 |
| Scheduling time - 2 threads | 36.20 ticks (±3.55 ticks) |
34.08 ticks (±4.10 ticks) |
1.06 |
| Micro - Time for syscall (getpid) | 3.72 ticks (±0.60 ticks) |
3.45 ticks (±0.58 ticks) |
1.08 |
| Memcpy speed - (built_in) block size 4096 | 81604.86 MByte/s (±56575.84 MByte/s) |
82448.38 MByte/s (±56997.13 MByte/s) |
0.99 |
| Memcpy speed - (built_in) block size 1048576 | 30140.45 MByte/s (±24405.16 MByte/s) |
30585.98 MByte/s (±24707.84 MByte/s) |
0.99 |
| Memcpy speed - (built_in) block size 16777216 | 28803.89 MByte/s (±23700.74 MByte/s) |
26340.06 MByte/s (±21720.96 MByte/s) |
1.09 |
| Memset speed - (built_in) block size 4096 | 81915.23 MByte/s (±56797.42 MByte/s) |
82292.76 MByte/s (±56891.50 MByte/s) |
1.00 |
| Memset speed - (built_in) block size 1048576 | 30858.39 MByte/s (±24822.25 MByte/s) |
31323.85 MByte/s (±25145.86 MByte/s) |
0.99 |
| Memset speed - (built_in) block size 16777216 | 29563.62 MByte/s (±24141.28 MByte/s) |
27104.68 MByte/s (±22209.94 MByte/s) |
1.09 |
| Memcpy speed - (rust) block size 4096 | 74069.60 MByte/s (±51678.12 MByte/s) |
74097.96 MByte/s (±51811.44 MByte/s) |
1.00 |
| Memcpy speed - (rust) block size 1048576 | 30052.47 MByte/s (±24377.01 MByte/s) |
30361.60 MByte/s (±24602.37 MByte/s) |
0.99 |
| Memcpy speed - (rust) block size 16777216 | 28913.43 MByte/s (±23816.93 MByte/s) |
27625.34 MByte/s (±22806.88 MByte/s) |
1.05 |
| Memset speed - (rust) block size 4096 | 74532.83 MByte/s (±52018.63 MByte/s) |
74373.47 MByte/s (±51976.48 MByte/s) |
1.00 |
| Memset speed - (rust) block size 1048576 | 30786.20 MByte/s (±24799.64 MByte/s) |
31110.89 MByte/s (±25033.24 MByte/s) |
0.99 |
| Memset speed - (rust) block size 16777216 | 29674.71 MByte/s (±24253.88 MByte/s) |
28386.93 MByte/s (±23265.03 MByte/s) |
1.05 |
| alloc_benchmarks Build Time | 82.02 s |
74.76 s |
1.10 ❗ |
| alloc_benchmarks File Size | 0.92 MB |
0.87 MB |
1.05 ❗ |
| Allocations - Allocation success | 91.37 % |
91.31 % |
1.00 ❗ |
| Allocations - Deallocation success | 100.00 % |
100.00 % |
1 |
| Allocations - Pre-fail Allocations | 61.61 % |
61.44 % |
1.00 ❗ |
| Allocations - Average Allocation time | 6314.74 Ticks (±82.44 Ticks) |
5860.58 Ticks (±98.43 Ticks) |
1.08 ❗ |
| Allocations - Average Allocation time (no fail) | 6880.72 Ticks (±108.38 Ticks) |
6554.81 Ticks (±92.86 Ticks) |
1.05 ❗ |
| Allocations - Average Deallocation time | 1268.95 Ticks (±253.67 Ticks) |
1805.01 Ticks (±250.35 Ticks) |
0.70 ❗ |
| mutex_benchmark Build Time | 81.79 s |
79.82 s |
1.02 ❗ |
| mutex_benchmark File Size | 0.94 MB |
0.86 MB |
1.10 ❗ |
| Mutex Stress Test Average Time per Iteration - 1 Threads | 12.22 ns (±0.46 ns) |
12.10 ns (±0.41 ns) |
1.01 |
| Mutex Stress Test Average Time per Iteration - 2 Threads | 69.24 ns (±3.80 ns) |
40.26 ns (±1.68 ns) |
1.72 ❗ |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
|
|
||
| Ok(event & available) | ||
| future::poll_fn(|cx| { | ||
| CONSOLE_WAKER.lock().register(cx.waker()); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We only need to register the waker when retuning Pending.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think there's a possibility of receiving an interrupt between checking for readiness and registering a waker. I'm not sure how high the chance for this to occur is during normal execution, or if there's something in place preventing this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You are right. We could either check again before returning Pending to optimize the fast path or restore your original proposal. Both are fine with me. Performance should not really be an issue here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think I'd prefer the original version, as it looks a bit cleaner.
I believe ConsoleStdin::read() has the same possibility, should I just do a separate commit in this pr?
f43b81b to
aafb6a5
Compare
mkroening
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks good to me, thanks! :)
aafb6a5 to
b2097d0
Compare
Fixes #2748
Before
ConsoleStdin::poll()did not register a waker so if no input has been received before calling select(), the thread is stuck, even when receiving input afterwards.I have edited the poll function to be closer to ConsoleStdin::read(), so it now correctly registers the waker and checks for input when a UART Interrupt is received.
This has fixed the reproducer that did not function before: