Repository navigation
Shut down vm on unrecoverable errors. - #2755
jounathaen wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Assisted-by: Anthropic Claude
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Benchmark Results
Details
| Benchmark | Current: bd82420 | Previous: 2e23902 | Performance Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| startup_benchmark Build Time | 84.02 s |
80.34 s |
1.05 ❗ |
| startup_benchmark File Size | 0.85 MB |
0.80 MB |
1.07 ❗ |
| Startup Time - 1 core | 0.73 s (±0.03 s) |
0.75 s (±0.02 s) |
0.98 |
| Startup Time - 2 cores | 0.72 s (±0.02 s) |
0.74 s (±0.02 s) |
0.98 |
| Startup Time - 4 cores | 0.73 s (±0.02 s) |
0.74 s (±0.02 s) |
0.98 |
| multithreaded_benchmark Build Time | 84.39 s |
82.11 s |
1.03 ❗ |
| multithreaded_benchmark File Size | 0.95 MB |
0.86 MB |
1.10 ❗ |
| Multithreaded Pi Efficiency - 2 Threads | 90.27 % (±9.01 %) |
85.89 % (±6.61 %) |
1.05 |
| Multithreaded Pi Efficiency - 4 Threads | 44.66 % (±3.06 %) |
43.43 % (±2.56 %) |
1.03 |
| Multithreaded Pi Efficiency - 8 Threads | 26.36 % (±1.51 %) |
25.76 % (±1.53 %) |
1.02 |
| micro_benchmarks Build Time | 82.01 s |
80.40 s |
1.02 ❗ |
| micro_benchmarks File Size | 0.95 MB |
0.86 MB |
1.10 ❗ |
| Scheduling time - 1 thread | 65.31 ticks (±2.62 ticks) |
62.65 ticks (±4.06 ticks) |
1.04 |
| Scheduling time - 2 threads | 35.04 ticks (±4.04 ticks) |
34.08 ticks (±4.10 ticks) |
1.03 |
| Micro - Time for syscall (getpid) | 3.78 ticks (±0.61 ticks) |
3.45 ticks (±0.58 ticks) |
1.10 |
| Memcpy speed - (built_in) block size 4096 | 80434.96 MByte/s (±56046.84 MByte/s) |
82448.38 MByte/s (±56997.13 MByte/s) |
0.98 |
| Memcpy speed - (built_in) block size 1048576 | 30515.62 MByte/s (±24501.74 MByte/s) |
30585.98 MByte/s (±24707.84 MByte/s) |
1.00 |
| Memcpy speed - (built_in) block size 16777216 | 29030.03 MByte/s (±23898.40 MByte/s) |
26340.06 MByte/s (±21720.96 MByte/s) |
1.10 |
| Memset speed - (built_in) block size 4096 | 79945.25 MByte/s (±55700.64 MByte/s) |
82292.76 MByte/s (±56891.50 MByte/s) |
0.97 |
| Memset speed - (built_in) block size 1048576 | 31245.65 MByte/s (±24923.30 MByte/s) |
31323.85 MByte/s (±25145.86 MByte/s) |
1.00 |
| Memset speed - (built_in) block size 16777216 | 29803.51 MByte/s (±24350.99 MByte/s) |
27104.68 MByte/s (±22209.94 MByte/s) |
1.10 |
| Memcpy speed - (rust) block size 4096 | 74844.25 MByte/s (±52240.71 MByte/s) |
74097.96 MByte/s (±51811.44 MByte/s) |
1.01 |
| Memcpy speed - (rust) block size 1048576 | 30178.07 MByte/s (±24413.29 MByte/s) |
30361.60 MByte/s (±24602.37 MByte/s) |
0.99 |
| Memcpy speed - (rust) block size 16777216 | 29000.67 MByte/s (±23864.30 MByte/s) |
27625.34 MByte/s (±22806.88 MByte/s) |
1.05 |
| Memset speed - (rust) block size 4096 | 74998.46 MByte/s (±52344.15 MByte/s) |
74373.47 MByte/s (±51976.48 MByte/s) |
1.01 |
| Memset speed - (rust) block size 1048576 | 30900.70 MByte/s (±24830.46 MByte/s) |
31110.89 MByte/s (±25033.24 MByte/s) |
0.99 |
| Memset speed - (rust) block size 16777216 | 29770.22 MByte/s (±24313.61 MByte/s) |
28386.93 MByte/s (±23265.03 MByte/s) |
1.05 |
| alloc_benchmarks Build Time | 82.34 s |
74.76 s |
1.10 ❗ |
| alloc_benchmarks File Size | 0.93 MB |
0.87 MB |
1.07 ❗ |
| Allocations - Allocation success | 91.37 % |
91.31 % |
1.00 ❗ |
| Allocations - Deallocation success | 100.00 % |
100.00 % |
1 |
| Allocations - Pre-fail Allocations | 61.61 % |
61.44 % |
1.00 ❗ |
| Allocations - Average Allocation time | 6316.00 Ticks (±98.57 Ticks) |
5860.58 Ticks (±98.43 Ticks) |
1.08 ❗ |
| Allocations - Average Allocation time (no fail) | 6886.21 Ticks (±112.63 Ticks) |
6554.81 Ticks (±92.86 Ticks) |
1.05 ❗ |
| Allocations - Average Deallocation time | 1273.03 Ticks (±286.43 Ticks) |
1805.01 Ticks (±250.35 Ticks) |
0.71 ❗ |
| mutex_benchmark Build Time | 82.97 s |
79.82 s |
1.04 ❗ |
| mutex_benchmark File Size | 0.95 MB |
0.86 MB |
1.10 ❗ |
| Mutex Stress Test Average Time per Iteration - 1 Threads | 12.26 ns (±0.52 ns) |
12.10 ns (±0.41 ns) |
1.01 |
| Mutex Stress Test Average Time per Iteration - 2 Threads | 68.16 ns (±3.66 ns) |
40.26 ns (±1.68 ns) |
1.69 ❗ |
This comment was automatically generated by workflow using github-action-benchmark.
| if remaining_tasks == 0 { | ||
| warn!("Last task exited with exit code {exit_code}, shutting down"); | ||
| shutdown(-1); | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
We could even do a panic here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, that would be another option. I don't have a direct preference.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The edge case here would be the last task exiting with sys_exit. That is probably not supposed to happen, but it's also not a panic, is it?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The all tasks exit with sys_exit: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/ce37c4ff837c5c5dc45cddf9e1e3704e42ca67ea/library/std/src/sys/pal/hermit/mod.rs#L72-L74
But sys_exit shuts down the system, not only the task.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
sorry, I meant sys_thread_exit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Rust-world does not expose sys_thread_exit at all. They make use of the fact that the thread function is allowed to return. The kernel calls scheduler exit internally, then. sys_thread_exit is used in pthread-embedded, even though it does not have to be.
I don't know how such a situation is possible. The main thread shuts down the whole process and kills all threads, so this situation cannot be caused by an application. It might be a kernel-internal situation, which might warrant panicking, I believe.
| error!("Aborting kernel execution"); | ||
| shutdown(-1); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why is this needed when we already have the previous commit?
Note that sys_abort currently shuts down Hermit, but scheduler::abort only kills the affected task deliberately, so other tasks are not affected.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What is the motivation for this behaviour on "abort"?
For example, if we have two tasks running, and the other task is e.g., blocking, we'd end up in a frozen state.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
That's how things always work, no? It's the application's responsibility to shut down the system when a thread or process aborting is an unrecoverable failure for the application.
When a second process segfaults, the first process should not be affected. For threads, we might want to kill the whole process since we don't have signals, but other recovery mechanisms would also work.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
True, but we are not talking about processes here, but only threads, right? So this change implements the "kill the whole process since we don't have signals" aspect.
Or is your point about the masos case?
I encountered the hypervisor indefinitely hanging on unrecoverable errors. This PR shuts down the VM in these cases.