Conversation
…d form Nothing enforced the disclosure convention. In the sibling repositories the drift it exists to prevent returned twice, once when a port merged after the normalisation pass carrying the older per-edit form, and once because that pass had covered source files only. This repository is currently clean, and this keeps it so. Added scripts/check_ai_disclosure.sh, which rejects the superseded per-edit form, a doubled comment marker, more than one disclosure line in a file, and any spelling of the line that is not exact. It runs from repo_checks.yml, a workflow with no path filter, because a source-path filter is what hid the build files elsewhere. The check passes on this repository as it stands. Each of its four rules was confirmed to fail on a tree with that defect reintroduced, and to pass once it was removed. Assisted-by: Claude Code (Opus 5) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Nothing enforced the disclosure convention, so the drift it exists to prevent returned twice: once when a port merged after the normalisation pass carrying the older per-edit form, and once because that pass had covered source files only, leaving build files and scripts untouched for months.
Added
scripts/check_ai_disclosure.sh, which rejects the superseded per-edit form, a doubled comment marker, more than one disclosure line in a file, and any spelling of the line that is not exact. It runs fromrepo_checks.yml, a workflow with no path filter, because a source-path filter is what hid the build files the first time.The check passes on this repository as it stands. Each of its four rules was confirmed to fail on a tree with that defect reintroduced, and to pass once it was removed.
Assisted-by: Claude Code (Opus 5) noreply@anthropic.com