Skip to content

[#25619] Changed Python Linters workflow to be executed only in PRs - #550

Merged
Danipiza merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/remove-python_lin
Sep 16, 2026
Merged

Danipiza merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
ci/remove-python_lin

Conversation

@Danipiza

@Danipiza Danipiza commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Changed workflow to only execute Python Linters in PRs. Related with Uncrustify PR

Signed-off-by: danipiza <dpizarrogallego@gmail.com>
@Danipiza Danipiza added this to the v3.6.0 milestone Sep 15, 2026
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 15, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 32.29%. Comparing base (6152dba) to head (ed3e7c6).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #550      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   33.87%   32.29%   -1.59%     
==========================================
  Files          16       16              
  Lines         614      576      -38     
  Branches      334      307      -27     
==========================================
- Hits          208      186      -22     
+ Misses        199      191       -8     
+ Partials      207      199       -8     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Danipiza Danipiza changed the title [#25619] Only execute python linters in PRs [#25619] Changed Python Linters workflow to be executed only in PRs Sep 16, 2026
@Danipiza
Danipiza merged commit 3a9a04b into main Sep 16, 2026
19 of 20 checks passed
@Danipiza
Danipiza deleted the ci/remove-python_lin branch September 16, 2026 17:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants