Skip to content

Clarify missing firmware result for bootflash check - #487

Merged
monrog2 merged 4 commits into
v4.3.1-devfrom
codex/issue-483-check20-verbosity
Oct 28, 2026
Merged

monrog2 merged 4 commits into
v4.3.1-devfrom
codex/issue-483-check20-verbosity

Conversation

@monrog2

@monrog2 monrog2 commented Oct 27, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Summary

  • explain that bootflash capacity was not evaluated when required firmware metadata is missing
  • identify the 32-bit and 64-bit image requirement for ACI 6.0(2)+ targets and improve remediation guidance
  • document the distinction between missing image metadata and detected insufficient space
  • cover the reported 5.2(6e) to 6.0(9e) missing 64-bit image path

Testing

  • Python 3.8 full unit suite: 1464 passed

Closes #483

@monrog2 monrog2 linked an issue Oct 27, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@monrog2
monrog2 merged commit 5a5c071 into v4.3.1-dev Oct 28, 2026
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Enhancement verbosity for Check 20

1 participant