Skip to content

"alternatives" to testing (type checkers, linters,...) #247

Description

@mmesiti

Testing is important, but nowadays we also have compilers/typecheckers (e.g., Mypy, but also ruff does type checking I believe) and linters that can highlight problems with code.
Some things that you might have to write tests for could be covered by static type checkers which get you information even quicker than running tests.

It's kind of weird that we talk about testing for correctness, but we don't mention potentially cheaper and more convenient alternatives and safety nets and their limitations (heh! I don't need tests, my code compiles!)

Problem: I honestly don't know how evolved is the R tooling in this regard.

(please assign label "idea" or something similar to this issue)

Activity

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions