Repository navigation
Validate ellipsoid nonlinear heave with radiation convolution - #34
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changed
Nonlinear_Hydro/ode4/RegularCICbaseline and extend the existing heave mesh mode to convolution radiation.Paired evidence
On 3,001 saved MATLAB states, radiation convolution agrees within 3e-10 N, nonlinear buoyancy within 6e-9 N, drag within 7e-11 N, and heave excitation within 4e-7 N. The independent 150 s Python trajectory differs by at most 6.39 mm heave, 7.41 mm/s velocity, 8.89 kN PTO force, and 8.98 kW absorbed power. The previous constant-radiation ellipsoid case still passes its gates.
Verification
actionlintandgit diff --checkpassed.SungJun Won's original commits remain in branch ancestry.