Repository navigation
Potential fix for code scanning alert no. 364: Missing rate limiting - #87
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Warning Review limit reachedYou've used all free OSS reviews for now. Wait for the free limit to reset to keep reviewing this public repository. Next included review available in 58 minutes. View limit detailsLimit details: You’ve used the included review currently available. Review configuration: ⚙️ Run configuration
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Contributor
Reviewer's guide (collapsed on small PRs)Reviewer's GuideThe PR adds express-rate-limit to bots.js, defines a shared 15-minute/60-request limiter, and applies it ahead of existing auth checks on plugin download and installation routes to mitigate denial-of-service risk while preserving endpoint behavior. Sequence diagram for rate-limited plugin package operationssequenceDiagram
participant Client
participant Router
participant Limiter as pluginPackageRateLimiter
participant Auth as authenticateUniversal
participant Access as checkBotAccess
participant Handler as PluginEndpoint
Client->>Router: Plugin install or download request
Router->>Limiter: rateLimit(request)
alt 60 requests reached in 15 minutes
Limiter-->>Client: Rate limit response
else request allowed
Limiter->>Auth: authenticateUniversal(request)
Auth->>Access: checkBotAccess(request)
Access->>Handler: Execute plugin operation
Handler-->>Client: Plugin response
end
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
mmeerrkkaa
marked this pull request as ready for review
October 5, 2026 22:42
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Potential fix for https://github.com/blockmineJS/blockmine/security/code-scanning/364
The best fix is to add an explicit route-level rate-limiting middleware and apply it to the flagged download endpoint (and optionally sibling expensive plugin install endpoints) before auth/authorization handlers. This preserves existing functionality while adding request throttling to reduce DoS risk.
In
backend/src/api/routes/bots.js:express-rate-limit.router.get('/:botId/plugins/:pluginId/download', ...)(the flagged location),POST /:botId/plugins/install/localPOST /:botId/plugins/install/zipThis addresses the reported alert and reduces risk across similar high-cost routes without changing business logic.
Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.
Summary by Sourcery
Bug Fixes: