Skip to content

Clarify the first-year burn and bond boost - #173

Open
hiciefte wants to merge 3 commits into
bisq-network:mainfrom
hiciefte:review/docs-p42-reputation-burn-bond-boost
Open

hiciefte wants to merge 3 commits into
bisq-network:mainfrom
hiciefte:review/docs-p42-reputation-burn-bond-boost

Conversation

@hiciefte

@hiciefte hiciefte commented Nov 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Replaces #74, which was opened from a branch in this repository. The changes and commits are the same.

Keep both original BSQ procedures and numeric examples; label their values as initial scores and state the current time boost.

Scope: 3 targeted replacements in 1 article(s):

  • src/content/docs/wiki/reputation2.md

Evidence checked on 8 November 2026:

Review limits:

  • Narrow correction only; remaining historical claims and untested product/provider flows are not certified.
  • The original article places explanatory scoring prose in preformatted boxes. These edits change that prose and its values, not executable commands.

Validation: exact replacement and preservation checks; git diff --check; standalone Astro build for /bisq-docs/; site checks covering 209 original articles, 307 compatibility routes, links/fragments and all 120 image assets. Existing image URLs/dimensions and anchors remain; any deliberate code or caption correction is visible in this diff.

Publication gate: npm run build intentionally remains blocked by the original-wording fidelity check for the edited articles. Original receipts were not refreshed to approve these edits. Human acceptance and a separately reviewed acceptance record are required before publication.

Ready for support and CRAI review. This proposal is not merged or deployed. Source formatting was separated into the wording-preserving baseline so this diff contains only the proposed changes.

Keep both original BSQ procedures and numeric examples; label their
values as initial scores and state the current time boost.

Keep original source and review snapshots unchanged. Leave publication
blocked pending support review and explicit acceptance of these edits.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🚫 Excluded labels (none allowed): 1

  • wording-proposal

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Run configuration

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

hiciefte added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2026
The 74 wording proposals were reopened from a fork as #100-#173. Update the PR links in review/PROPOSAL-INDEX.md and review/proposal-coverage.json to the new numbers. The two links to CodeRabbit notices stay on the old PRs, where those comments are.
@hiciefte hiciefte added the wording-proposal Wording change to a restored article; reviewed by people, skipped by CodeRabbit label Nov 10, 2026
main converted the restored articles from HTML to Markdown (bisq-network#188). Each
article this branch edits is now the converter's output for the branch's
edited HTML (scripts/convert-articles-to-markdown.mjs), and renders to the
same page as that HTML. The wording change itself is unchanged.
@hiciefte
hiciefte requested a review from a team November 11, 2026 16:07

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

wording-proposal Wording change to a restored article; reviewed by people, skipped by CodeRabbit

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant