Skip to content

Update USPS fees and money-order form guidance - #164

Open
hiciefte wants to merge 3 commits into
bisq-network:mainfrom
hiciefte:review/docs-p27-usps-fees
Open

hiciefte wants to merge 3 commits into
bisq-network:mainfrom
hiciefte:review/docs-p27-usps-fees

Conversation

@hiciefte

@hiciefte hiciefte commented Nov 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Replaces #65, which was opened from a branch in this repository. The changes and commits are the same.

Change only the dated fee values and preserve all security/design/mailing instructions and images. Retain the payee/purchaser sections and privacy discussion, but remove categorical criminal-law and blank-field advice not established by the source.

Scope: 8 targeted replacements in 1 article(s):

  • src/content/docs/wiki/us-postal-money-order.md

Evidence checked on 8 November 2026:

Review limits:

  • Narrow correction only; remaining historical claims and untested product/provider flows are not certified.
  • No legal/tax determination,bank-compliance guarantee or mandatory Bisq evidence policy is asserted. Other old mailing-video and outcome claims remain for separate policy review.

Validation: exact replacement and preservation checks; git diff --check; standalone Astro build for /bisq-docs/; site checks covering 209 original articles, 307 compatibility routes, links/fragments and all 120 image assets. Existing image URLs/dimensions and anchors remain; any deliberate code or caption correction is visible in this diff.

Publication gate: npm run build intentionally remains blocked by the original-wording fidelity check for the edited articles. Original receipts were not refreshed to approve these edits. Human acceptance and a separately reviewed acceptance record are required before publication.

Ready for support and CRAI review. This proposal is not merged or deployed. Source formatting was separated into the wording-preserving baseline so this diff contains only the proposed changes.

Change only the dated fee values and preserve all
security/design/mailing instructions and images. Retain the
payee/purchaser sections and privacy discussion, but remove categorical
criminal-law and blank-field advice not established by the source.

Keep original source and review snapshots unchanged. Leave publication
blocked pending support review and explicit acceptance of these edits.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Nov 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Important

Review skipped

Auto reviews are limited based on label configuration.

🚫 Excluded labels (none allowed): 1

  • wording-proposal

Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

Run configuration

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

  • Trigger review

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

Share

@hiciefte hiciefte added the wording-proposal Wording change to a restored article; reviewed by people, skipped by CodeRabbit label Nov 10, 2026
hiciefte and others added 2 commits November 10, 2026 16:38
main converted the restored articles from HTML to Markdown (bisq-network#188). Each
article this branch edits is now the converter's output for the branch's
edited HTML (scripts/convert-articles-to-markdown.mjs), and renders to the
same page as that HTML. The wording change itself is unchanged.
@hiciefte
hiciefte requested a review from a team November 11, 2026 16:06

This branch has not been deployed

No deployments
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

wording-proposal Wording change to a restored article; reviewed by people, skipped by CodeRabbit

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant