Conversation
jerry-024
marked this pull request as draft
September 15, 2026 09:41
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Purpose
A filter such as
duration >= 30 AND duration < 120currently evaluates the two BTree predicates separately, scans both half-ranges, and intersects their candidate row IDs. This can make index lookup expensive even when the final range is selective.Combine lower and upper bounds on the same field under
ANDinto one bounded BTree scan. Forward the combined range through the union and row-ID offset readers, reuse existing index-file pruning, and preserve inclusive/exclusive endpoints. Other index readers retain the default evaluation of supported bounds.Tests
ORor different fields are not fused; run existing BTree and bitmap table regression tests.