[WIP] KVM: Support multi vlan trunk NICs

[Pearl1594]

Description

This PR adds support for multi-vlan trunk NICs
// TODO: details to be added

Types of changes

• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• Enhancement (improves an existing feature and functionality)
• Cleanup (Code refactoring and cleanup, that may add test cases)
• Build/CI
• Test (unit or integration test code)

Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity

Feature/Enhancement Scale

• Major
• Minor

Bug Severity

• BLOCKER
• Critical
• Major
• Minor
• Trivial

Screenshots (if appropriate):

How Has This Been Tested?

How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?

[github-actions]

This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 19.67213% with 147 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 19.89%. Comparing base (dc0ba1c) to head (219f9cb).

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...rc/main/java/com/cloud/vm/dao/NicNetworkMapVO.java	0.00%	58 Missing ⚠️
...in/java/com/cloud/vm/dao/NicNetworkMapDaoImpl.java	0.00%	32 Missing ⚠️
...ervisor/kvm/resource/LibvirtComputingResource.java	0.00%	20 Missing ⚠️
...g/apache/cloudstack/api/response/HostResponse.java	0.00%	12 Missing ⚠️
...ngine/schema/src/main/java/com/cloud/vm/NicVO.java	0.00%	6 Missing ⚠️
...java/com/cloud/agent/manager/AgentManagerImpl.java	28.57%	2 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
...org/apache/cloudstack/utils/CloudStackVersion.java	85.18%	2 Missing and 2 partials ⚠️
...java/com/cloud/upgrade/DatabaseUpgradeChecker.java	50.00%	2 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
...java/com/cloud/upgrade/dao/Upgrade42300to2400.java	57.14%	3 Missing ⚠️
...a/org/apache/cloudstack/veeam/api/dto/Version.java	50.00%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
... and 1 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##               main   #14166      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     19.89%   19.89%   -0.01%     
- Complexity    20144    20150       +6     
============================================
  Files          6371     6374       +3     
  Lines        576829   577001     +172     
  Branches      70627    70633       +6     
============================================
+ Hits         114778   114785       +7     
- Misses       449507   449667     +160     
- Partials      12544    12549       +5     

Flag	Coverage Δ
uitests	3.71% <ø> (ø)
unittests	21.16% <19.67%> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions
27.7% Coverage on New Code (required ≥ 40%)

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[github-actions]

🔴 Test Coverage Grade: D — Marginal

Metric	Value
Line coverage	24.81%
Branch coverage	19.02%

Grade Scale

Grade	Line Coverage	Meaning
🟢 A	≥ 80%	Excellent - this code sleeps well at night 😴
🟡 B	60-79%	Good - almost there, don't stop now 😉
🟠 C	40-59%	Acceptable - your code is wearing a seatbelt, but no airbags 😬
🔴 D	20-39%	Marginal - boldly shipping where no test has gone before 🖖
⛔ F	< 20%	Failing - tests? what tests? 🔥

Branch coverage is shown as a secondary signal. Grade is determined by line coverage.
View full Actions run