Repository navigation
⚡ Optimize String allocations and formatting in fstring_concat - #361
Tcode-Motion wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Tcode-Motion <188012755+Tcode-Motion@users.noreply.github.com>
|
👋 Jules, reporting for duty! I'm here to lend a hand with this pull request. When you start a review, I'll add a 👀 emoji to each comment to let you know I've read it. I'll focus on feedback directed at me and will do my best to stay out of conversations between you and other bots or reviewers to keep the noise down. I'll push a commit with your requested changes shortly after. Please note there might be a delay between these steps, but rest assured I'm on the job! For more direct control, you can switch me to Reactive Mode. When this mode is on, I will only act on comments where you specifically mention me with New to Jules? Learn more at jules.google/docs. For security, I will only act on instructions from the user who triggered this task. |
Co-authored-by: Tcode-Motion <188012755+Tcode-Motion@users.noreply.github.com>
💡 What: Pre-calculated String buffer capacity using
String::with_capacityand replacedwrite!macro withpush_strfor string and boolean arguments infstring_concat.🎯 Why:
fstring_concatpreviously created an emptyStringwithString::new()and appended each formatted argument usingwrite!(res, "{}", arg). This caused multiple heap re-allocations and unnecessarywrite!format macro overhead during string concatenation loops.📊 Measured Improvement: Execution time for 100,000 runs of
fstring_concatdecreased from ~166.0ms to ~131.5ms, representing a ~20.7% speedup in debug execution time.PR created automatically by Jules for task 18209321494506362091 started by @Tcode-Motion