Updated outdated reference to BishopFox article in iam-001 - #40
Merged
Merged
Conversation
ASCIIFry
requested review from
andrewkrug,
christophetd,
raesene and
sethsec
as code owners
September 10, 2026 03:23
sethsec
approved these changes
Sep 10, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What type of PR is this? (check all applicable)
Description
The path iam-001 contained a dead reference to a BishopFox article. The blog article moved to a different location. The new reference was selected based on the article title and content.
How to reproduce and testing
Navigate to the updated reference and see that it covers the topic of iam-001