Repository navigation
RUM-19153: Migrate readers to shared RUM context - #4027
Conversation
🎉 All green!🧪 All tests passed 🎯 Code Coverage (details) 🔗 Commit SHA: 40fe938 | Docs | View more details | Give us feedback! |
cdbf208 to
6c37d17
Compare
f4f6e96 to
e9ae12a
Compare
|
@codex review |
Codex Review SummaryThis comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. 👍 Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggeredSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
fe11ef3 to
4915b79
Compare
|
@codex review |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. You're on a roll. Reviewed commit: ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubYour team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback". |
🛡️ Codex Security Review · Automatically triggeredSecurity review completed. No security issues were found in this pull request. Reviewed commit: Only the user who started this review can view the report in Codex. ℹ️ About Codex security reviews in GitHubThis is an experimental Codex feature. Security reviews are triggered when:
Once complete, Codex will leave suggestions, or a comment if no findings are found. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
More details
The shared RUM publisher supplies the values expected by the migrated readers, while legacy flat fields remain available to cross-platform consumers. The completed static review identified no actionable regression.
🤖 Bits Code Review · Commit 4915b79
4915b79 to
40fe938
Compare
What does this PR do?
Migrates the remaining Android RUM context readers in Flags, Profiling, Trace, WebView, and Session Replay to the shared typed
RumContextintroduced in #4019. Replay and WebView cache the typed snapshot instead of the mutable feature map.Motivation
RUM-19153: replace repeated field parsing with shared types, preparing for the context changes in #3970. #4019 has merged; this PR now targets
develop.Additional Notes
Legacy flat fields remain published for cross-platform consumers, including Flutter Session Replay. Updated tests use typed-only contexts. Affected unit and JVM integration suites, formatting, Detekt, and generated-file checks passed.
Review checklist (to be filled by reviewers)