[PWGJE] TOF-veto selection fixed

[arvindkhuntia]

No description provided.

[github-actions]

O2 linter results: ❌ 0 errors, ⚠️ 57 warnings, 🔕 0 disabled

[alibuild]

Error while checking build/O2Physics/code-check for 20b21e7 at 2026-09-19 13:16:

## sw/BUILD/re2-latest/log
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:84 (find_package):

Full log here.

[alibuild]

Error while checking build/O2Physics/code-check for ddccf35 at 2026-09-20 11:53:

## sw/BUILD/VecGeom-latest/log
CMake Error at /container/bits/sw/BUILD/4b902089e8ae3e1235b16cffffe5b41003a490dd/VecGeom/buildExternals/VecCore-0.8.0/build/external/stamp/VecCore-0.8.0-configure-RELWITHDEBINFO.cmake:49 (message):
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
CMake Error at cmake/modules/BuiltinVecCore.cmake:36 (add_custom_command):
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:222 (find_package):

Full log here.

[alibuild]

Error while checking build/O2Physics/staging for ddccf35 at 2026-09-20 09:41:

No log files found

Full log here.

[alibuild]

Error while checking build/O2Physics/o2 for ddccf35 at 2026-09-20 11:57:

## sw/BUILD/VecGeom-latest/log
CMake Error at /container/bits/sw/BUILD/4b902089e8ae3e1235b16cffffe5b41003a490dd/VecGeom/buildExternals/VecCore-0.8.0/build/external/stamp/VecCore-0.8.0-configure-RELWITHDEBINFO.cmake:49 (message):
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
CMake Error at cmake/modules/BuiltinVecCore.cmake:36 (add_custom_command):
CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:222 (find_package):

Full log here.

[nzardosh]

can you check this logic please?
It seems that if you dont find a jet and isWithJetEvents is false, then isWithLeadingJet is still true and you go into the fillTrackInfo and pass it leadingJetPtEtaPhi[1] which has a default value of zero. This gives you a fake jet where there shouldnt be one?

[arvindkhuntia]

Hi @nzardosh,

Thank you for pointing this out. Without a valid leading-jet guard, the default {0,0,0} vector could create a fake jet/perpendicular cone when isWithJetEvents=false and no jet is found. I fixed it by adding an explicit valid-leading-jet check. Many thanks.

[nzardosh]

Btw isConeAxisAccepted is not applied in processMCRec but it is in the others

[arvindkhuntia]

Currently, I am not using processMCRec process function but for consistency I can add isConeAxisAccepted in the next PR. Many thanks.