Skip to content

Place the space-frame sectors explicitly instead of dividing BBMO - #15809

Open
sawenzel wants to merge 1 commit into
AliceO2Group:devfrom
sawenzel:swenzel/frame-sectors-no-division
Open

sawenzel wants to merge 1 commit into
AliceO2Group:devfrom
sawenzel:swenzel/frame-sectors-no-division

Conversation

@sawenzel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This replaces the phi division of the space-frame mother BBMO by 18 explicit placements of the sector volume BBCE, so that the sector contents survive the conversion to Geant4.

  • Geant4 divides a polyhedra in phi by its number of sides and ignores the requested width and offset, and its cell frame sits at the start of a sector where TGeo's sits at the centre.
  • Both conversion routes, ROOT's GDML writer and VGM, are affected, so the 18 FTOS service boxes placed in BBCE were absent from the Geant4 geometry.
  • The TGeo geometry is unchanged: same node count, same BBCE shape and content, same global placements, no new overlaps.
  • With this, the ray-by-ray mass thickness of the two Geant4 geometries agrees with TGeo to 9e-8 relative, against 5e-5 before.

https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/O2-7153

This replaces the phi division of the space-frame mother BBMO by 18 explicit
placements of the sector volume BBCE, so that the sector contents survive the
conversion to Geant4.

- Geant4 divides a polyhedra in phi by its number of sides and ignores the
  requested width and offset, and its cell frame sits at the start of a sector
  where TGeo's sits at the centre.
- Both conversion routes, ROOT's GDML writer and VGM, are affected, so the 18
  FTOS service boxes placed in BBCE were absent from the Geant4 geometry.
- The TGeo geometry is unchanged: same node count, same BBCE shape and content,
  same global placements, no new overlaps.
- With this, the ray-by-ray mass thickness of the two Geant4 geometries agrees
  with TGeo to 9e-8 relative, against 5e-5 before.

https://its.cern.ch/jira/browse/O2-7153
@sawenzel
sawenzel force-pushed the swenzel/frame-sectors-no-division branch from d1f1771 to 32afd3b Compare September 16, 2026 16:47
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant