diff --git a/evaluation/README.md b/evaluation/README.md
index 55323235..8cbc5a74 100644
--- a/evaluation/README.md
+++ b/evaluation/README.md
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@ clean control deliberately writes UTF-8 text and downloads the existing bytes
 through a default-encoding InStream: transport alone does not transcode text
 and must not trigger the encoding rule.
 
+An article whose rule is about comments themselves cannot be evaluated once its samples lose their full-line comments. List it under `keepComments` in `review-fixtures.json` (an `article` path and a non-empty `reason`) and preparation keeps that article's sample comments; `Good`/`Bad` tokens are still neutralized. Use it only when the rule is about the comments, and prefer `coverageWaivers` when keeping them would reveal the expected outcome.
+
 The SCM `articles` override deliberately selects every rule in the initial
 functional domain, producing nine positive cases and nine clean controls.
 Business context is executable: document/status `TestField` guards,
diff --git a/evaluation/review-fixtures.json b/evaluation/review-fixtures.json
index 5fc0cfbb..8245f759 100644
--- a/evaluation/review-fixtures.json
+++ b/evaluation/review-fixtures.json
@@ -13,6 +13,16 @@
       "reason": "The defect is the expectation that the layout becomes the default; the code alone is identical to a legitimate optional layout once comments are removed."
     }
   ],
+  "keepComments": [
+    {
+      "article": "microsoft/knowledge/testing/test-feature-scenario-tags.md",
+      "reason": "The rule is about the [FEATURE]/[SCENARIO]/[GIVEN]/[WHEN]/[THEN] comment tags themselves; stripping full-line comments removes the tags from the good sample."
+    },
+    {
+      "article": "microsoft/knowledge/style/al-comments-must-not-restate-what-code-already-shows.md",
+      "reason": "The rule is about comments themselves; stripping full-line comments leaves its bad sample with no comments, so the rule can never fire."
+    }
+  ],
   "overrides": {
     "copilot": {
       "articles": [
diff --git a/microsoft/knowledge/testing/test-feature-scenario-tags.bad.al b/microsoft/knowledge/testing/test-feature-scenario-tags.bad.al
index 06e5d54f..040247c7 100644
--- a/microsoft/knowledge/testing/test-feature-scenario-tags.bad.al
+++ b/microsoft/knowledge/testing/test-feature-scenario-tags.bad.al
@@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ codeunit 50102 "Item Price Testing"
         SalesHeader: Record "Sales Header";
         SalesLine: Record "Sales Line";
     begin
-        // setup mixed with assertions, no clear layers, no FEATURE/SCENARIO/GIVEN/WHEN/THEN tags
         LibrarySales.CreateCustomer(Customer);
         LibraryInventory.CreateItem(Item);
         LibraryPriceCalculation.CreatePriceHeader(
diff --git a/tools/Test-ReviewFixtures.ps1 b/tools/Test-ReviewFixtures.ps1
index f9be5127..2d494f11 100644
--- a/tools/Test-ReviewFixtures.ps1
+++ b/tools/Test-ReviewFixtures.ps1
@@ -162,6 +162,22 @@ foreach ($overrideDomain in $overrides.Keys) {
     }
 }
 
+$keepCommentsArticles = @{}
+$keepCommentsSeen = [System.Collections.Generic.HashSet[string]]::new([System.StringComparer]::Ordinal)
+if ($manifest.PSObject.Properties.Name -contains 'keepComments') {
+    foreach ($entry in @($manifest.keepComments)) {
+        if (-not $entry.article -or -not $entry.reason) {
+            $problems.Add('Each keepComments entry requires non-empty article and reason values.') | Out-Null
+            continue
+        }
+        if ($keepCommentsArticles.ContainsKey([string]$entry.article)) {
+            $problems.Add("Duplicate keepComments entry: $($entry.article)") | Out-Null
+            continue
+        }
+        $keepCommentsArticles[[string]$entry.article] = [string]$entry.reason
+    }
+}
+
 $coverageWaivers = @{}
 if ($manifest.PSObject.Properties.Name -contains 'coverageWaivers') {
     foreach ($waiver in @($manifest.coverageWaivers)) {
@@ -300,12 +316,21 @@ foreach ($domain in $leafDomains) {
             if ($context) {
                 $case | Add-Member -NotePropertyName context -NotePropertyValue $context
             }
+            if ($keepCommentsArticles.ContainsKey($articlePath)) {
+                $case | Add-Member -NotePropertyName keepComments -NotePropertyValue $true
+                $keepCommentsSeen.Add($articlePath) | Out-Null
+            }
             $caseList.Add($case) | Out-Null
         }
     }
 
 }
 $cases = @($caseList)
+foreach ($keepCommentsArticle in $keepCommentsArticles.Keys) {
+    if (-not $keepCommentsSeen.Contains($keepCommentsArticle)) {
+        $problems.Add("keepComments article is not a selected evaluation article: $keepCommentsArticle") | Out-Null
+    }
+}
 
 $seenIds = [System.Collections.Generic.HashSet[string]]::new([System.StringComparer]::Ordinal)
 foreach ($case in $cases) {
@@ -464,7 +489,13 @@ if ($PrepareDirectory) {
         # Good, Bad, or Anti-pattern. Strip full-line comments and neutralize those
         # object-name tokens so model-facing fixtures do not reveal the expected
         # outcome while preserving executable AL structure and references.
-        $neutralText = [regex]::Replace($sourceText, '(?m)^\s*//.*(?:\r?\n|$)', '')
+        # An article whose rule is about the comments themselves is listed under
+        # keepComments in review-fixtures.json and keeps them; its samples carry no
+        # answer-revealing labels (Good/Bad is still neutralized below).
+        $neutralText = $sourceText
+        if (-not ($case.PSObject.Properties.Name -contains 'keepComments' -and $case.keepComments)) {
+            $neutralText = [regex]::Replace($neutralText, '(?m)^\s*//.*(?:\r?\n|$)', '')
+        }
         $neutralText = [regex]::Replace($neutralText, '\b(?:Good|Bad)\b', 'Eval')
         Set-Content -LiteralPath (Join-Path $PrepareDirectory $neutralName) -Value $neutralText -Encoding UTF8
         $requestCase = [pscustomobject]@{ id = $modelId; file = $neutralName }